<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.2.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Krestyanovedenie</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Крестьяноведение</journal-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Russian Peasant Studies</trans-title></trans-title-group>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2500-1809</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2949-2564</issn>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">KHOHRY</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Научная статья</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Утопии Александра Богданова и Александра Чаянова: выбор пути сельско-городского развития и его последствия для сельского человеческого капитала и социальной дифференциации</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Utopias of Alexander Bogdanov and Alexander Chayanov: The choice of rural-urban development and its consequences for rural human capital and social differentiation</trans-title></trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name-alternatives>
            <name xml:lang="ru">
              <surname>Никулин</surname>
              <given-names>Александр Михайлович</given-names>
            </name>
            <name xml:lang="en">
              <surname>Nikulin</surname>
              <given-names>Alexander M.</given-names>
            </name>
          </name-alternatives>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name-alternatives>
            <name xml:lang="ru">
              <surname>Троцук</surname>
              <given-names>Ирина Владимировна</given-names>
            </name>
            <name xml:lang="en">
              <surname>Trotsuk</surname>
              <given-names>Irina V.</given-names>
            </name>
          </name-alternatives>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <institution>Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы</institution>
          <country>RU</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2023</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>23</fpage>
      <lpage>40</lpage>
      <abstract xml:lang="ru">
        <p>Научно фундированный разговор о нынешнем состоянии сельских территорий, перспективах сельского человеческого капитала и тенденциях сельской дифференциации невозможен без опоры на концептуальные разработки и футуристические проекты великих российских аграрников. Статья посвящена сравнению футуристических воззрений двух замечательных социальных мыслителей начала XX века - Александра Богданова и Александра Чаянова, выраженных в их утопических произведениях, которые в художественной форме запечатлели особенности (пролетарские и крестьянские) их социально-экономических и культурно-этических взглядов. Богданов и Чаянов отличались энциклопедическими познаниями и блестящими организаторскими способностями, опубликовали оригинальные работы в области социальной философии и политической экономии, были яркими социально-политическими лидерами альтернативных направлений русской революции, а также писателями-футурологами. Богданов в своих утопиях развивал марксистские идеи пролетарской революции и построения социализма не только на земле, но и в космосе. Чаянов в своей утопии умеренного кооперативного социализма отстаивал новое революционное значение крестьянства. Пролетарский идеолог Богданов скептически относился к политическому потенциалу крестьянства, опасаясь, что противники пролетарской революции могут использовать крестьянский консерватизм против социалистической революции. Крестьянский идеолог Чаянов скептически оценивал творческий потенциал рабочего класса, полагая, что в грядущем социальном перевороте рабочий класс может быть использован для построения авторитарно-бюрократического социализма. Оба мыслителя стремились через анализ альтернатив взаимодействия человека и природы оценить перспективы глобального сельско-городского развития. Несмотря на игнорирование положительного революционного потенциала пролетариата (Чаянов) и крестьянства (Богданов), оба внесли огромный вклад в теорию и практику русской революции, а их утопические идеи по-прежнему вдохновляют на поиски нового справедливого, гуманного и счастливого мира.</p>
      </abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>A science-based conversation about the current state of rural areas, prospects for rural human capital and trends in rural differentiation is impossible without the conceptual approaches and futuristic projects of great Russian agrarian scientists. The article presents an attempt of comparing such ideas of two outstanding social thinkers of the early 20th century - Alexander Bogdanov and Alexander Chayanov, focusing on their utopias as representing the essential features (proletarian and peasant) of their social-economic and cultural-ethical views. Bogdanov and Chayanov had extensive encyclopedic knowledge and brilliant organizational skills; they wrote original works on social philosophy and political economy; both were prominent leaders of alternative social-political directions of the Russian Revolution. Moreover, Bogdanov and Chayanov wrote several famous utopias: Bogdanov’s utopia develops Marxist ideas of proletarian revolution and construction of socialism not only on earth but also in space; Chayanov’s utopia of moderate cooperative socialism defends the new revolutionary significance of the peasantry. The proletarian ideologist Bogdanov was skeptical about the political potential of the peasantry, arguing that opponents of proletarian revolution would use peasant conservatism against socialist revolution. The peasant ideologist Chayanov was skeptical about the creative potential of the working class, predicting that in the coming social revolution it would be used to build authoritarian-bureaucratic socialism. However, both thinkers sought prospects for rural-urban development through the analysis of possible ways of interaction between man and nature. Despite the ignorance of the positive revolutionary potential of the proletariat (Chayanov) and the peasantry (Bogdanov), both thinkers made huge contributions to the theory and practice of the Russian Revolution, and their utopian ideas still inspire the search for a new just, humane and happy world.</p>
      </trans-abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Chayanov</kwd>
        <kwd>Bogdanov</kwd>
        <kwd>utopia</kwd>
        <kwd>proletariat</kwd>
        <kwd>peasantry</kwd>
        <kwd>marxism</kwd>
        <kwd>corporatism</kwd>
        <kwd>colonialism</kwd>
        <kwd>human capital</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
        <kwd>Чаянов</kwd>
        <kwd>Богданов</kwd>
        <kwd>утопия</kwd>
        <kwd>пролетариат</kwd>
        <kwd>крестьянство</kwd>
        <kwd>марксизм</kwd>
        <kwd>корпоративизм</kwd>
        <kwd>колониализм</kwd>
        <kwd>человеческий капитал</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <p>Полнотекстовая версия статьи готовится к публикации.</p>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>Литература</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Alexander Bogdanov and the Origins of Systems Thinking in Russia (1998) (Ed. by J. Biggart, P. Dudley, F. King), Aldershot: Ashgate.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Banaji J. (1976) Chayanov, Kautsky, Lenin: Considerations towards a synthesis. Economic and Political Weekly, no 11, pp. 1594-1607.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Bernstein H. (2009) V. I. Lenin and A. V. Chayanov: Looking back, looking forward. Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 36, no 1, pp. 55-81.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Biggart J. (1989) Alexander Bogdanov, left Bolshevism and the Proletkult 1904-1932, University of East Anglia.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. (1914) The Science of Social Consciousness, Moscow: Publishing House of Writers. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. (1918) Fates of the Workers' Party in the current revolution. Part 1. New Life, no 19. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. (2017) The Philosophy of Living Experience: Popular Outlines, Haymarket Books. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A.A. (1911) Cultural Tasks of Our Time, Moscow: S. Dorovatovsky and A. Charushnikov Publishing House. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A.A. (1987) A Short Course on Economics, Moscow: Publishing House of A. M. Murinova. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. A. (1908) Red Star, Saint Petersburg. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. A. (1912) Engineer Manny, Moscow. (In Rusian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. A. (1924) On Proletarian Culture. 1904-1924, Moscow-Leningrad: Kniga. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. A. (1990) War communism and state capitalism. Issues of Socialism, Moscow: Politizdat, pp. 311-320. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Bogdanov A. A. (2023) Tektology: The Universal Organizational Science, Moscow: URSS. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Brass Т. (1996) Popular culture, populist fiction(s): The agrarian utopiates of A. V. Chayanov, Ignatius Donnelly and Frank Capra. Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 24, no 1-2, pp. 153-190.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Bruish К. (2014) Als Das Dorf noch Zukunf war Agrarismus und Expertise zwischen Zarenreich und Sowjetunion, Köln.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (2019a) A Short Course on Cooperation.Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 8-56.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (1920) State collectivism and peasant cooperation. Cooperative Life, no. 1-2, pp. 6-12. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (2018a) Letter from A. V. Chayanov to V. M. Molotov on the current state of agriculture in the USSR compared with its pre-war state and the situation in agriculture of capitalist countries (October 6, 1927).Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 3, no 3, pp. 6-18.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (2018b) What is the Agrarian Question? Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 6-33.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (2019b) On differentiation of the peasant economy.Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 4, no 4, pp. 6-21.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (2020a) Main Ideas and Methods of Social Agronomy (Part 1).Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 6-30.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (2020b) Main Ideas and Methods of Social Agronomy (Part 2).Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 6-55.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (2021) What will our national economy be like after the war? Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 6, no 1, pp. 6-12. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov A. V. (Kremnev Ivan) (1920) The Journey of My Brother Alexei to the Land of Peasant Utopia, Moscow. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>Chayanov's School: Between Past and Future (2020) Collection of Materials of the International Scientific Conference of the Chayanov Research Center on October 22-23, 2020 / Ed. by A. M. Nikulin, M. G. Pugacheva, Moscow: Ekon-Inform. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>Chibnik M. (1984) A cross-cultural examination of Chayanov's theory. Current Anthropology, vol. 25, no 3, pp. 335-340. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>Durrenberger P. E. (1984) Chayanov, Peasants, and Economic Anthropology, Orlando: Harcourt Brace.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Ferns С. (1999) Narrating Utopia: Ideology, Gender, Form in Utopian Literature, Liverpool University Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Gare A. (2000) Aleksandr Bogdanov and systems theory. Democracy & Nature, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 341-359.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>George L. (2021) Interpreting Alexander Chayanov's peasant utopia since 1991. History and Politics, vol. 38, pp. 9-34.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Gerasimov I. V. (1997) Human Soul in the Transitional Time: The Case of A. Chayanov, Kazan: ANNA. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Gloveli G. D. (2004) Red Star and Red Rose: From the history of Russian utopia. Bulletin of the International Institute of Alexander Bogdanov, no 3, pp. 71-95.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Grigoryan N. (2015) Revolution on Earth and on Mars: Malthusian thought experiments in the novels Red Star by A. Bogdanov and Aelita by A. N. Tolstoy. New Literary Observer, no 2, pp. 141-160. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Harrison M. (1975) Chayanov and the economics of the Russian peasantry. Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 2, no 4, pp. 389-417.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Harrison M. (1979) Chayanov and the Marxists. Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 7, no 1, pp. 86-100.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Klementsov N. (2011) A Martian Stranded on Earth: Alexander Bogdanov, Blood Transfusions, and Proletarian Science, Chicago-London: University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Merl S. (2022) Was Chayanov's concept of peasant agriculture under the Soviet rule realistic? The emerging of the kulturniki in answer to the Litsom k derevne policy.Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 7, no 2, pp. 6-37.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Nikulin A. (2011) Tragedy of a Soviet Faust: Chayanov and Central Asia 1917-1937. Soviet Era in Anthropology of Eurasia. Halle Studies, vol. 4, pp. 211-219.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Nikulin A., Trotsuk I. (2016) Utopian visions of contemporary rural-urban Russia. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, vol. 1, no 5, pp. 673-690.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Nikulin A. M., Trotsuk I. V. (2023) Two and a half undeservedly forgotten conceptual foundations of rural sociology.RUDN Journal of Sociology, vol. 23, no 3, pp. 468-484. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Proceedings of the First All-Union Conference of Marxist Agrarians (1930), Moscow, vol. 1. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Raskov D. (2014) Socialist agrarian utopia in the 1920s: Chayanov. Oeconomia: History, Methodology, Philosophy, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 123-146. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Roberts R., Mutersbaugh T. (1996) On rereading Chayanov: Understanding agrarian transitions in the industrialized world. Environment and Planning A, vol. 28, pp. 951-956.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>Schmitt G. (1992) The rediscovery of Alexander Chayanov. History of Political Economy, vol. 24, no 4, pp. 925-965.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Shanin T. (1986) Chayanov's message: Illuminations, miscomprehensions, and the contemporary ‘development theory'. Chayanov A. V. The Theory of Peasant Economy / Ed. by D. Thorner, B. Kerblay, R. E.F. Smith, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Shanin T., Nikulin A., Trotsuk I., van der Ploeg J. D. (2023) Peasants: Chayanov's Recovered Essays, Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Shanin T. (2009) Chayanov's treble death and tenuous resurrection: An essay about understanding, about roots of plausibility and about rural Russia. Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 36, no 1, pp. 83-101.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation>Sharapov Yu.P. (1997) Lenin and Bogdanov: From cooperation to confrontation.Russian History, no 5, pp. 55-67. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Shcheglov A. (1937) Lenin's Fight against Bogdanov's Revision of Marxism, Moscow. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Trotsuk I. V. (2023) Rural human capital in the conceptual optics: Continuum and/or postism? RUDN Journal of Sociology, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 338-354. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Trotsuk I. V., Subbotina M. V. (2019) Happiness and heroism, personal and collective as main elements of the ‘bright future' in the Soviet (non)utopia.RUDN Journal of Sociology, vol. 19, no 4, pp. 835-848. (In Russian)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Uleri F. (2019) Capitalism and the peasant mode of production: A Chayanovian analysis. Russian Peasant Studies, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 43-60.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>van der Ploeg J. D. (2013) Peasants and the Art of Farming: A Chayanovian Manifesto, Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Weber M. (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Routledge.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>White J. D. (2018) Red Hamlet. The Life and Ideas of Alexander Bogdanov, Leiden-Boston: Brill.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Yassour A. A. (2017) Bogdanov and His Work: A Guide to the Published and Unpublished Works of Alexander A. Bogdanov (Malinovsky) 1873-1928, London: Taylor & Francis.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>